Monday, June 30, 2008

Meet the new War; Same as the old War

With the Iraqi war winding down and the finish line in sight, “much to the dismay of democrats who openly rooted for our defeat” perhaps now we can turn our attention to actually ending the war on terror by winning the damn thing the way wars are actually won, by complete and total attrition, annihilation and an ambiguity for the sanctity of life. For the squeamish, effeminate or easily offended I suggest you turn off your computer now, get a glass of warm milk and curl up with your cat, you sissy.
While most of the world, “especially Europe” engaged in speechifying, hand wringing and “Neville Chamberlainism” Iran has pressed full speed ahead in their quest for a nuclear weapon, finding a wry sense of amusement in the sanctions we heap upon them.
As we enter the twilight of the Bush administration, heading into the warm and fuzzy, “let’s play kissy face with dictators” Obamalama presidency, urgent, takes on a much more sense of urgency. President Bush needs to light this firecracker and get this party started.
And, we do we need to understand one thing, the only thing these child raping, women stoning, camel herding jokers understand is unabashed, unvarnished brutality, with extreme prejudice.
Of course, we could continue negotiating, sanctioning and saying pretty please but in the end most of Israel would disappear in a mushroom cloud, Israel’s retaliation would most certainly destroy Iran and Syria then we could sit back and literally watch the Middle East disambiguate the expected caliphate.
Or, we could drop our purses along with our political correctness and man up, we need to do a “Patton” on their Islamic asses and make it our national goal to kill as many civilians as we do terrorists. Yes, I said it, and I damn well meant it.
Let’s take a walk down history lane and actually analyze our tactics in the last war we actually fought to win, World War Two. Our Napalm bombing of Japanese cities killed more civilians that Hiroshima and Nagasaki put together. Night bombing over Germany decimated most of their major cities. But, we had a strategy, and that was to destroy their will to wage war. Guess what sports fans? It worked and can work again. We need to carpet bomb Iran until we’re out of bombs and then start dropping illegal aliens with firecrackers. Soon enough they’ll say uncle…..or Allah.
Conservative Springfield 01JUL08

Thursday, June 26, 2008

Have Gun, Will Travel

I’ve hesitated to pop the cork on the champagne after learning of the affirmation in the United States Supreme Court case Heller v Washington. In the majority opinion, Justice Antonin Scalia said the amendment protected an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia and to use that arm for self-defense within the home. While good news, what is problematic to me, was the narrow decision. We have four Supreme Court justices who quite simply rejected the United States constitution. This confirms a suspicion I’ve held for some time and it’s deserving of relation. Most Americans and too many judges simply do not understand the inception of our constitution, its purpose and its inspiration. Luckily for you, my devoted readers, I do and am willing to proffer a peek into my intellect and insightfulness.

Ask any citizen where our rights as Americans emanate from and the usual response will be from our constitution. This education is so wrong as to be criminal and the educational system doling out this pabulum need face indictment with prejudice. The sacred words of Thomas Jefferson in our Declaration of Independence; “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” To repeat, we are endowed by our creator. Our rights come from God, not government. The bill of rights, including our second amendment, was written to protect those God given rights from government intrusion. The bill of rights is singular, not collective, meaning they apply to the individual, not communally. To understand our constitution one must understand the authors and their reasoning. Our founders were suspicious and fearful of government and felt that absolute power must abide within the electorate not the elected. One must remember the colonies were escaping the oppressiveness of King George.

But, it isn’t that simple. The document conceived by the patriots who pledged their lives, fortunes and sacred honor had to have been divinely inspired; there is no other reasonable explanation. And, today, four Justices of the United States Supreme court not only cheapened this document that we conservative hold as sacrosanct, they desecrated the memory of those brave men that bore this country.

Conservative Springfield 27JUN08

Justice Kennedy or Elmer Fudd

Anthony Kennedy once again proved to the legal community that Alzheimer’s has stricken at least five of the Justices currently serving on the United States Supreme Court. Apparently they have forgotten the constitution they swore to protect and defend. In a five to four ruling the court found it unconstitutional to put to death those who would harm the most innocent among us, our children. Justice Kennedy, writing for the majority said, “The Constitution barred a state from imposing the death penalty for the rape of a child when the crime did not result, and was not intended to result, in the victim's death”. As a student of our constitution, I would impolitely ask Justice “Elmer Fudd” just where in our constitution is the text barring a state from imposing the death penalty for any crime? And don’t give me that eighth amendment argument because trust me; my mind contains more intellect than yours, that’s a given. The Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause is the only part of the Amendment that has been made applicable to the states via the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. But, what the legal eagles miss is pivotal and prescient. It is one simple word. That word is, “AND”. {Emphasis Mine} Up to and including the 1930’s the French still imposed death by guillotine for the most heinous crimes. It was common practice. Is it cruel, certainly, is it unusual, not at all; Texas does it everyday, twice on Sundays. In this country we legally snuff out murderers of all sorts and sizes making this world a better place to live in, providing income for funeral directors and it gives me a warm, toasty feeling. Is it cruel to kill them, of course, it is not unusual. The eight amendment prohibits cruel and unusual punishment, it does not state cruel or unusual punishment.

Justice Kennedy went on to say, “A national consensus exists against capital punishment for the crime of child rape and that the death penalty, based on current evolving standards, should be reserved for the worst crimes that take the victim's life.” Excuse my language as I believe foul language only expresses a negligence of vocabulary but just what consensus is this son of a bitch talking about? I’ve never heard of such a consensus and were it true, we are now to decide constitutionality on consensus? This case makes the stark truth known and indisputable, our Supreme Court as configured is not judging, they are legislating. Our founders intended for the courts to have the least influence over the lives of the electorate yet today our courts have become the arbiter of social policy usurping the authority of we the people. What Justice Kennedy did today was to place the interests of the most evil among us over our beloved children and our most innocent.

Conservative Springfield 26 Jun08

Tuesday, June 24, 2008

I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take it anymore

That’s it, tomorrow I’m stopping off at my local tractor supply store and buying a pitchfork, and then I’m off in search of a torch, a big one. {Size Matters} I learned today that the United States Supreme Court will now decide if the U.S. Navy will be allowed to use sonar during their training exercises because, “leftists’ wacko freaks” contend emanating sonar gives the whales a headache. I want the Supreme Court to decide if liberals have the right to inhabit my country, they give me a headache requiring vast quantities of pharmaceuticals and Kentucky bourbon, I’m just saying. The burning question, for me, is just how damn long we are going to put up with this minority of loud little Lilliputian liberals lamenting the constant erosion of our personal freedoms and steering this country down the road to Socialism at break neck speed. For Christ’s sake, in 2012 we will lose the freedom to purchase incandescent light bulbs. Today we can purchase tobacco products but have to lock ourselves in a closet with an air freshener, a fire extinguisher and a hazmat suit just to smoke the overtaxed product we purchased. I have to purchase a sticker from my state, just to put my boat in the water. And, dare I place a fishing pole in that boat I have to buy a fishing license to commune with our God given nature. I have to buy car insurance though I can afford to replace any car I may damage. I can’t burn my own leaves, out of my own trees, in my own frigging yard because there is a majority of idiots out there hand wringing over the scam that is global warming. I have to get a building permit to build on my property and then pay a greater share of tax because of the improvements I paid for. I have to hand over 35% of my earnings to a corrupt government, under the threat of jail, to support fellow Americans I have never met and are too damn lazy to earn their own living. I have to contribute to a Social Security program I will never participate in. I have to wear a seat belt even if I want to fly through my damn windshield. As a law abiding citizen I have to register my handguns while criminals do not.

As Americans we are forced to endure a myriad of rules, regulations, laws and edicts from a mere 535 overpaid, oversexed, egotistical, elected echinococcus to the electorate they presume to represent. Well, look, these rapists of the sacrosanct document that is our constitution can kiss my white American ass, both cheeks.

Look folks, it’s time we stood up to these stuffed shirt slime balls and take our country back. The America we live in is not the country envisioned by our founders and I’m mad as hell about it and I’m not going to take it anymore! How about you?

Conservative Springfield 24Jun08

Saturday, June 21, 2008

Jihad Harmony; Where Terrorists Go To Find Love

Hi, I’m Dr. Ali Neil Clark Yusef Clark Warren Clark Osama and I’m the president and founder of Jihad harmony. You don’t have to settle on those other Jihadist dating sites that only offer you a picture and a profile. At Jihad Harmony® we identify 32 Islamic characteristics to find you that perfect match to ensure livelong compatibility until Allah calls you home to your reward of 72 virgins, or for you Islamic women, until you get the stoning you deserve. Praise Allah. This could be the first day of the rest of your life, until you blow yourself up, killing innocent women and children. Act now and receive our free newsletter, “Jihadist Monthly”. This months issue explores the differences between suicide belts and suicide vests. You’ll also find out which knife Jihadist prefers for infidel beheadings. And, that’s not all. Be one of the first 100 callers and receive a genuine hijab signed and endorsed by Osama Bin Laden.
At Jihad Harmony® you’re not just another suicide bomber to us. Our staff will give you the personal attention you deserve and with our money back guarantee if you’re not happy with our service we’ll blow ourselves up! What sets us apart from other dating sites is that with every successful match we’ll give you the goat of your choice and the head of an infidel. How can you say no to that? Let’s face it my friends, the Jihadist life is a lonely one but with Jihad Harmony® it doesn’t have to be. Call now, radical Islamists are waiting.
Conservative Springfield 21JUN08

Friday, June 20, 2008

C'mon Justice Scalia, You Were My Hero

Just what in the wide, wide world of sports is going on here? My personal hero, Justice Scalia went off the deep end in the Opinion: Meacham v. KAPL, Inc. today and caused me to re-think my entire world view. Perhaps those justices in the majority forgot the 1895, “Coffin v. United States, 156 U.S. 432; 15 S. Ct. 394” Supreme Court decision wherein the presumption of innocence was first adjudged and established. In Meacham, the majority found that any suit brought forth by a person over forty, alleging age discrimination, is to be considered valid, putting the burden of proof on the defendant. If you skipped that class in ambulance chasing I’ll explain. Any seasoned citizen, fired by his employer has the ability to file a lawsuit against said employer for age discrimination without any evidence and no requirement to prove their case. Under today’s ruling it would fall upon the employer, who fired the aged, to prove it wasn’t age discrimination. What the hell? One might argue, and I am, the defendant, in many cases will be required to prove a negative, not easily done. But more important, it reverses more than one hundred years of case law. Look folks, I’m not trying to make the case for age discrimination but I also don’t accept the premise that the government can tell me who I can hire and in return, whom I can fire. That’s not freedom. Yet, if we were to accept these unconstitutional laws then it would seem to me we should also accept the long held view that everyone is innocent, until proven guilty. That would apply to civil law as well as criminal infractions.
In, “Coffin” the court wrote, “The principle that there is a presumption of innocence in favor of the accused is the undoubted law, axiomatic and elementary, and its enforcement lies at the foundation of the administration of our law”.
Suppose, for the sake of argument, we were to apply this same standard to sexual harassment, race discrimination or fair housing laws? By the Supreme Court placing the burden upon the defense they have set a precedent, one that without doubt will be taken advantage of by anyone under the allusion of being wronged and the first trial lawyer he runs in to.
Conservative Springfield 20JUN08

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

Cowboys, Lions and John McCain

Politics, pestilence, punditry and pontifications, lately, we’ve covered it all, with our expected aplomb, brilliance and wry sense of humor. We’ve tackled the tough issues in depth and with a coveted insight unseen before in the annals of classic historical literature save Dickens or Twain. But, it’s time to lighten things up, just a bit, for you edification and enjoyment. Why you’re asking, with baited breath, awaiting a prescient profundity. Because my pigskin, gridiron brethren; it’s June, and we all know what that entails and implies. In just two short, sultry, sweaty months we top off our favorite adult beverage, order a pizza, lie back in our favorite Lazy Boy, prop our feet up and get ready for some football. That’s right football aficionados, just two months until our unbearable, long awaited wait is over. In August it’s back, pre-season football. Cheerleaders, monster hits, corner blitzes, quarterback sacks and dare I mention it again, I dare, I dare… cheerleaders. I get all goosepimply just thinking about it.
I absolutely know what you’re thinking, at this moment as you read our written words. Your first thought is, “my God this man is a literary genius and at the same time you’re asking yourself, “rightly so” what the hell Conservative Springfield, a sports story, Football?
I consider our readers and my staff to have a familial relationship and my viewers doubting of my unparalleled, unequaled, unvarnished, unambiguous aptitude and ability to combine the finest of sports, “football” into an award winning composition of polemic comparative conservatism not only beguiles the genius of this author but belittles the intellect of the recipient of this masterful literary content.
An unavoidable truism, as our observations turn to gaze upon the leaves, absent their sustaining Chlorophyll, accepting of the introduction of fall, conservative’s fallback position to a lackluster candidate and ensuing bloodletting politically might possibly be the distraction of the greatest sport devised by man, football. After all, watching the Senator from Arizona thrown to the lions couldn’t possibly be as much fun as the cowboys thumping the lions.
Conservative Springfield 19JUN08